AI Weekly Malaysia

Back to items Summaries

Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

ID
36440
Status
new
Published
17 Oct 2026, 6:06 AM
Fetched
17 Oct 2026, 6:15 AM
Provider
Simon Willison
Category
developer-ai
Original URL
https://simonwillison.net/2026/Oct/16/code-review/
Source URL
https://simonwillison.net/atom/everything/

Excerpt

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague. Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny. — Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review Tags: anthropic, claude, ai, claude-code, llms, addy-osmani, coding-agents, generative-ai, agentic-engineering, code-review

Summary

No summary yet. It will appear after the daemon summarizes this item.

Top